Monday, December 30, 2013

The Sleazy Serpents

I'll start this post by explaining why I am so tardy in commenting on the NY POST story from 12/11/2013. As all of you know I am housed at the MDC federal lockup in the borough of Brooklyn, New York City. It seems the Bureau of Prisons has this inept policy that does not allow any of the local papers to be delivered to the prisoners at MDC, even though the newspapers get delivered to the jail for the BOP staff everyday. For us, the papers must be mailed in so we receive the newspapers about two weeks late. That is why it was just this weekend when I came across a story about that cartoon character in a can, that Disney Land reject, that vigilante in pantyhose: Curtis (Sleazy) Sliwa.

It seems that his world has turned a little upside down and it is now him that the finger of accusation points to; and what a sick, twisted, demented trigger finger it is. First, he has protected sex with a human (Melinda Katz) and then he has unprotected sex with a test tube. Next, the contents of the test tube affair wind up in the body of the human that he had protected sex with (Melinda Katz). How weird is that? Put on your war paint Rudy (Skullhead) Giuliani you have competition for the heart of Sleazy Sliwa. I'm just not sure if it's Katz or the test tube. So back to the story...

It looks like Sleazy Sliwa and his new partner-in-crime Melinda Katz are trying to embezzle money from Sleazy's first son and his mother then give it to Katz and her two sons. I'm not sure if the test tube is a co-conspirator or not. Anyway the first mother puts up a fight that forces Sleazy and Katz to testify in court. So as Sleazy and Katz testify under oath they both tell two different stories about the amount of money that Melinda Katz is receiving from Curtis (Sleazy) Sliwa. He says that he pays her $10,000.00 a month. She says that he pays her $5,000.00 a month. A big, big difference. Could it be that the test tube gets the other $5,000.00? Don't think so.

Melinda Katz also answered incriminating questions with (I don't remember) more times than Donald Manes did during the investigation of the parking meter scandal. Why is she not charged with perjury? If it was an alleged mobster's wife, or Matilda Como, or any other woman of Italian descent Sleazy would be screaming for them to be prosecuted, beaten, even scourged until they told the truth. But this is Melinda Katz: his own personal politician, his ticket to NYC power, his subway to Gracie Mansion. So, all he could do was sit in the courtroom, hide his face in his hands, and watch as the dreams of his fascist regime slip away.

For the first time in the history of my blog I give the same alias to a husband and wife duo. Hence forth, Sleazy and Melinda shall be known as the Serpents because they both speak with a forked tongue: Curtis (the Serpent) Sliwa & Melinda (the Serpent) Katz.



Sunday, December 15, 2013


In today's post I would like to congratulate my friend and onetime codefendant Joel Cacace on his justified victory over a petty, deceitful, and corrupt prosecution team led by my old nemesis, the new head of the Organized Crime Dept. for the Eastern District of New York, Elizabeth "Lizzy the Liar" Geddes.

While her main flunky AUSA James "Tommy Pickles" Gatta tried to deceive the jury into believing that Joel was guilty as charged, Lizzy the Liar was orchestrating and recycling Dino "Hemorrhoids" Calabro's perjured testimony. She was trying to somehow make it more credible the second time around. Maybe she thought that the second jury was stupider than the first; but neither jury was stupid. Both juries were too sophisticated for Lizzy and her collection of lies. All the while these children of Satan know that myself, Dino Saracino, and Joel Cacace are innocent. Every piece of their evedience screamed for our acquittal. Joel's expert defense team of lead counsel Susan "Kosher" Kellman and learned counsel David "the Scholar" Stern swiftly and thoroughly devastated the prosecution's flimsy case.

Not since Johnnie Cochran and Barry Scheck has there been such a dominant duo in the courtroom. Susan "Kosher" Kellman is so savvy in the atmosphere of the courthouse that she let those fools beat themselves with their own evidence. That's right, the defense team knew enough not to mount a defense. Instead they had the brilliance to let the prosecution eat itself while they sat back and enjoyed their victory. Of course the fact that Joel was 100% innocent made a victory that much easier to achieve. I applaud Susan "Kosher" Kellman, David "the Scholar" Stern, the Jury and justice for exposing the truth in such a corrupt system as our federal justice System.