I just read Gangland's year-end review of how the murderers, rapists, drug dealers and child molesters from the FBI's rat squad (better known as Team America) fared as they faced the judges to answer to their multiple crimes and lives of greed and power. They all received government love taps with some getting time-served, even though they remained out on bail for the entire time they were ratting. Imagine that, time-served by doing NO TIME.
Well anyway, the story that really caught my attention was that of Anthony (Toothpicks) Basile. You see, "Toothpicks" was the first cooperator that the FBI used against me. He is the reason why I was arrested. They used his outright lies to arrest me and my codefendants, and to hold us without bail. So I was really amazed to read that the lead prosecutor in my case Elizabeth (Lizzy the Liar) Geddes shows up at Basile's sentencing and demands that he receive a life sentence for a murder that he was found guilty of. Rather than begging for leniency for her star rat (like she did for other rats), she states that he lied to the feds--he gave them useless information, helped to convict no one, smuggled illegal drugs into prison, had two cooperation agreements torn up and much, much more. So she demands that he receive life.
So what I wanted to know is why "Lizzy the Liar" went into the grand jury and convinced them to indict me and my codefendants from the testimony of Anthony Basile. After she indicted us for a slew of serious crimes she then petitions Washington and succeeds in getting us hit with the death penalty, all on perjured testimony!! Let me just shout this part so everyone can hear me-- AUSA ELIZABETH GEDDES WAS NOW TRYING TO EXECUTE US FOR CRIMES THAT AT SOME POINT EARLY ON IN THIS PROCESS SHE KNEW TO BE UNTRUE. How twisted on power is that?
Now when it was clear and she was certain that we were being held on death penalty charges that were bogus (and before she goes to the grand jury to get a new indictment obtained from evidence that she believes to be at least partly true) why didn't she have said charges (from Basile's untrue testimony) dismissed? Why didn't she at least withdraw her opposition for bail until she could put together a real case? Why did she not remove the DEATH PENALTY part? No this ugly bitch with the secrets of the grand jury and the power of a corrupt justice system toyed with our lives like a cat with a mouse.
Now will this corrupt Assistant United States Attorney or any of her coconspirators ever be punished for their crimes against their citizens? No. They have been and will continue to be rewarded for their crimes because this is the way they do business in the US Attorney's Office. Much like Valerie Caproni who completely aborted justice. She hid evidence, told lies of guilt against men she knew were innocent and allowed the guilty to remain free to keep killing. For all of this treachery she was rewarded by being made the Chief Counsel to the FBI! And today she has the dubious distinction of being the most dishonorable judge on the federal bench. You see her greatest reward up until now was to be appointed to a Federal District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York. All of these crimes were committed in the interest of putting a few innocent Italian Americans in prison for life.
The actions of the Justice Department (judges, prosecutors, FBI) are dwarfed only by the sheer volume of the crimes committed during the Holocaust, the Inquisition and the Salem Witch Hunt. The prosecutors intent is certainly just as vile as those in power during those horrendous times in history: to destroy a targeted group of people, guilty or not.
Our government has succeeded in destroying my life and the lives of many other innocent men and women. They have done this by breaking all of their own rules and by stripping us of most of our constitutional protections that were designed to protect us from such government tactics. One day the truth will end their careers and if not it will tarnish their legacy.
AUSA Ellen Corcella, FBI Agents Chris Favo and Jeff Tomlinson, FBI cooperators Frank (Blue Eyes) Sparaco and Greg Scarpa Jr. and many other government employees know the truth of the Justice Department's Second Circuit in the Eastern District of New York and their clandestine attack on Italian Americans and one day they will speak. The people must know the true nature of the officers of this court. May God and honorable men protect our nation.
SAVALOOO,
TSG
Saturday, January 23, 2016
Affluenza
Today I would like to offer my commentary on a few topics. Some issues are political and some are personal. I find all extremely interesting and hope that you do too.
The entire GOP is trying to devise a plot to remove (Curley) Donald Trump from the Republican primaries, or at least to retire him from his current pole position status. So what they must do to pluck him from the winner's circle is to show that he is a big loser: a fake, a phony, a fraud. They must show that he can lose some of his vast wealth, be defeated in the business of making money. That is his forte where he is king. That's a hard task, right? Not really. All they have to do is talk Curley into opening an all you can eat buffet in pudgy prosecutor Chris (Lead Belly) Christie's neighborhood and watch "Lead Belly" eat his fortune. "Curley" Trump will be flat broke by April Fool's Day and will probably wind up as one of New York's homeless. Bravo! Problem solved. Then they can advance on destroying that predator enabling Hillary (The Eraser) Clinton.
The GOP says "NO" to gun control, Muslims, Mexicans and Clean Air/Water--so if not for War and Greed just what is it the Republicans stand for?
I read a few weeks ago that Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia revealed his personal prejudiced opinion on why African Americans should not be the recipients of affirmative action to compensate them for past wrongs. He tried to explain away his negative statements by asserting that the bias was in the argument that he was presenting and not his own sentiment, but he was not just presenting the argument he was championing it as it was his own. All of the people (mostly lawyers) who believe that when an individual slips on a black robe they spontaneously receive the wisdom of Solomon and become void of all preconceived convictions both positive and negative are morons. These experiences are part of their life. It is who they are.
The judge on my case Brian (Buster Brown) Cogan allowed his anti-Italian bias to ooze forth as a regular occurrence. I remember once in particular when (because of the length of trial and it being the time that we would eat our main meal) we asked if we might be allowed to substitute food from the Court House Coffee Shop for the four slices of bread and one slice of each bologna and cheese that the court marshals provided once daily. "Buster Brown" Cogan (in a full courtroom) ranted about how he was not going to allow us to dine at the River Cafe. Huh? No doubt he got a flashback of a mental scene that was drawn from a past experience, book or movie that made him feel that all Italian American "alleged Mafioso" eat only at the River Cafe or some other high-priced restaurant and it angered him. So anyway he had many such outbursts where he let his anti-Italian hatred show. He even said to the other attorneys at sidebar while arguing a legal point: "Come on you know they were there." (at the crime scene)
So I think that Justice Scalia and my own Judge Cogan unwittingly exposed their bloomers to us and we saw dirt on them. But by no means is this a rare occurrance. It is rather commonplace in most courtrooms in our country. The people that think these humans can leave their essence in chambers when they take the bench are fools because these judges love, hate, laugh, cry and err just as we do; except they answer to no one and they own their judgeships for life.
Every person in the country knows that every state court and the federal courts have a separate and privileged way for dealing with their wealthy criminals. It is almost always done though secret negotiations that always seem to result in a sensational deal for the opulent scumbags. The key is confidential, classified and hidden negotiations. You see all the courts in the land must give the appearance of equality (equal justice for all) or risk rebellion from the people. So this is why everyone was so outraged when Texas infuriated its citizens and the whole country by accepting the defense of "affluenza" as a reason to let a rich, upper-crust, under-achieving, society-leech of a kid off with probation. That's right, no jail time for killing four innocent victims while drunk driving. I would like to know if the power brokers and judges of Texas were related to Marie Antoinette and if they want the poor in their state to eat cake.
SAVALOOO,
TSG
The entire GOP is trying to devise a plot to remove (Curley) Donald Trump from the Republican primaries, or at least to retire him from his current pole position status. So what they must do to pluck him from the winner's circle is to show that he is a big loser: a fake, a phony, a fraud. They must show that he can lose some of his vast wealth, be defeated in the business of making money. That is his forte where he is king. That's a hard task, right? Not really. All they have to do is talk Curley into opening an all you can eat buffet in pudgy prosecutor Chris (Lead Belly) Christie's neighborhood and watch "Lead Belly" eat his fortune. "Curley" Trump will be flat broke by April Fool's Day and will probably wind up as one of New York's homeless. Bravo! Problem solved. Then they can advance on destroying that predator enabling Hillary (The Eraser) Clinton.
The GOP says "NO" to gun control, Muslims, Mexicans and Clean Air/Water--so if not for War and Greed just what is it the Republicans stand for?
I read a few weeks ago that Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia revealed his personal prejudiced opinion on why African Americans should not be the recipients of affirmative action to compensate them for past wrongs. He tried to explain away his negative statements by asserting that the bias was in the argument that he was presenting and not his own sentiment, but he was not just presenting the argument he was championing it as it was his own. All of the people (mostly lawyers) who believe that when an individual slips on a black robe they spontaneously receive the wisdom of Solomon and become void of all preconceived convictions both positive and negative are morons. These experiences are part of their life. It is who they are.
The judge on my case Brian (Buster Brown) Cogan allowed his anti-Italian bias to ooze forth as a regular occurrence. I remember once in particular when (because of the length of trial and it being the time that we would eat our main meal) we asked if we might be allowed to substitute food from the Court House Coffee Shop for the four slices of bread and one slice of each bologna and cheese that the court marshals provided once daily. "Buster Brown" Cogan (in a full courtroom) ranted about how he was not going to allow us to dine at the River Cafe. Huh? No doubt he got a flashback of a mental scene that was drawn from a past experience, book or movie that made him feel that all Italian American "alleged Mafioso" eat only at the River Cafe or some other high-priced restaurant and it angered him. So anyway he had many such outbursts where he let his anti-Italian hatred show. He even said to the other attorneys at sidebar while arguing a legal point: "Come on you know they were there." (at the crime scene)
So I think that Justice Scalia and my own Judge Cogan unwittingly exposed their bloomers to us and we saw dirt on them. But by no means is this a rare occurrance. It is rather commonplace in most courtrooms in our country. The people that think these humans can leave their essence in chambers when they take the bench are fools because these judges love, hate, laugh, cry and err just as we do; except they answer to no one and they own their judgeships for life.
Every person in the country knows that every state court and the federal courts have a separate and privileged way for dealing with their wealthy criminals. It is almost always done though secret negotiations that always seem to result in a sensational deal for the opulent scumbags. The key is confidential, classified and hidden negotiations. You see all the courts in the land must give the appearance of equality (equal justice for all) or risk rebellion from the people. So this is why everyone was so outraged when Texas infuriated its citizens and the whole country by accepting the defense of "affluenza" as a reason to let a rich, upper-crust, under-achieving, society-leech of a kid off with probation. That's right, no jail time for killing four innocent victims while drunk driving. I would like to know if the power brokers and judges of Texas were related to Marie Antoinette and if they want the poor in their state to eat cake.
SAVALOOO,
TSG
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)